We will now examine the reproductive rights of women of Iraq. Before looking at the reproductive rights we should first understand women’s rights in general in this country. Women in Middle Eastern countries have more restrictions against them than women in many other parts of the world. The government’s laws are forbidden to go against the established rulings of Islam. Because the government and laws are constructed around the Islamic religion they tend to be very strict for women. Women have less freedom than men in Iraq which negatively impacts women's legal status in the labor code, criminal justice system, personal status, and mobility. Along with fewer freedoms, Iraqi women have limited access to priority reproductive health services.
In Iraq abortion is illegal and considered taboo. Because of this law people have been forced to practice “home abortions” or seek help from illegal abortionist. This is a very dangerous procedure when it is not done professionally. Many women are using these abortions to escape death by an honor killing.
The International Planned Parenthood Federation advocates reproductive rights and health all over the world. In Iraq this organization is hoping to:
-- create a favorable climate for family planning
-- improve quality of care for safe motherhood and child health
-- provide family planning education for women
-- provide infertility treatment
Family planning and contraception is a key point when discussing reproductive rights. In Iraq a national policy regarding access to contraception has been assured since 1993. Although contraception in Iraq is available, the rates in which women use the contraception are not very high. The contraceptive rate was only 32% in 2000. Being a country that is currently a war zone it is difficult to keep up the funds and research regarding family planning.
Reflection Questions:
Do you think it is right to go against the Iraqi culture to grant more reproductive rights for women?
Do you think legalizing abortion in Iraq would make a change in the role or status of women?
References:
http://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/wrd/iraq-women.htm
http://womensrights.change.org/blog/view/womens_rights_in_iraq_decreasing_by_the_day
http://www.ippf.org/en/Where/iq.htm
www.unfpa.org/rh/docs/iraq-rept04-08-03.doc
Posted by: Kayla Guelli
Group: Justi, Alicia, Rory, Kayla, and Bri
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Reproductive Rights in the USA
Out of the roughly 4 million births which were reported in the 2006 US Census;
-more than a one fourth were to unmarried women.
-almost 30% were to women under the age of 25.
-roughly one fourth were to women living below the poverty level.
-women living under the poverty level have a fertility level twice as high as those living at 200% of the poverty level.
There are many aspects to consider when it comes to reproductive rights in the United States. These include; birth control, emergency contraception, and abortion. When looking at any of these issues through the lens of feminist theory, the main connections are the ideas of power and responsibility (both financial and emotional)
Birth Control:
Birth control is available in multiple forms throughout the US. Medicaid is the US health care system provided to those living below the poverty line. Considering the high fertility rate among this population, I would like to consider how Medicaid deals with this issue. In every state, Medicaid plans include provisions for prescription birth control, while only some states include provisions for other forms, including over the counter supplies such as condoms. Prescription birth control pills must be taken everyday by a woman. The woman also must visit a doctor to obtain the prescription. Whatever cost is not covered by Medicaid will also fall to the woman. Most forms of birth control, including condoms, are expensive. By providing only for prescription birth control pills, Medicaid puts the burden of responsibility onto women, instead of men.
Emergency Contraception and Abortion:
While laws and policies differ from state to state, the majority of states have some type of policy which takes the decision to use emergency contraception away from the women, and puts it into the hands of doctors, pharmacists, and the government. When a woman makes the decision to request emergency contraception, numerous states leave it up to the doctors to decide weather or not to prescribe it, based on their own beliefs. Even if the doctor does decide to provide the prescription, many states also allow the pharmacist to decide weather or not they will then fill this prescription. In at least one state, doctors are even allowed to refuse emergency contraception to women who have been victim to sexual assault.
The issues surrounding abortion are very similar to those surrounding emergency contraception. While all of the responsibility for the pregnancy and life of a child will fall to the women, in many places, the decision is not left up to her, or at least not her alone. There is also a huge emotional and psychological burden involved in making the decision to use emergency contraception or to abort. When a woman has made the decision to seek either option, they still might have the power for making that decision stripped from them.
Reflection Questions:
Why do you believe that women are often expected to be responsible for birth control?
Should the federal or state government play a part in reproductive rights?
For more information, including state-by-state policies on abortion and emergency contraception, visit http://www.guttmacher.org/
Posted by Bri Connolly
-more than a one fourth were to unmarried women.
-almost 30% were to women under the age of 25.
-roughly one fourth were to women living below the poverty level.
-women living under the poverty level have a fertility level twice as high as those living at 200% of the poverty level.
There are many aspects to consider when it comes to reproductive rights in the United States. These include; birth control, emergency contraception, and abortion. When looking at any of these issues through the lens of feminist theory, the main connections are the ideas of power and responsibility (both financial and emotional)
Birth Control:
Birth control is available in multiple forms throughout the US. Medicaid is the US health care system provided to those living below the poverty line. Considering the high fertility rate among this population, I would like to consider how Medicaid deals with this issue. In every state, Medicaid plans include provisions for prescription birth control, while only some states include provisions for other forms, including over the counter supplies such as condoms. Prescription birth control pills must be taken everyday by a woman. The woman also must visit a doctor to obtain the prescription. Whatever cost is not covered by Medicaid will also fall to the woman. Most forms of birth control, including condoms, are expensive. By providing only for prescription birth control pills, Medicaid puts the burden of responsibility onto women, instead of men.
Emergency Contraception and Abortion:
While laws and policies differ from state to state, the majority of states have some type of policy which takes the decision to use emergency contraception away from the women, and puts it into the hands of doctors, pharmacists, and the government. When a woman makes the decision to request emergency contraception, numerous states leave it up to the doctors to decide weather or not to prescribe it, based on their own beliefs. Even if the doctor does decide to provide the prescription, many states also allow the pharmacist to decide weather or not they will then fill this prescription. In at least one state, doctors are even allowed to refuse emergency contraception to women who have been victim to sexual assault.
The issues surrounding abortion are very similar to those surrounding emergency contraception. While all of the responsibility for the pregnancy and life of a child will fall to the women, in many places, the decision is not left up to her, or at least not her alone. There is also a huge emotional and psychological burden involved in making the decision to use emergency contraception or to abort. When a woman has made the decision to seek either option, they still might have the power for making that decision stripped from them.
Reflection Questions:
Why do you believe that women are often expected to be responsible for birth control?
Should the federal or state government play a part in reproductive rights?
For more information, including state-by-state policies on abortion and emergency contraception, visit http://www.guttmacher.org/
Posted by Bri Connolly
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Introduction to how varying International Perspectives affect Child Rearing
Having an international perspective on some essential issues involving families shows how differently the same social institution can function in different cultural circumstances. In some countries, as mentioned in the blog on Tuesday, spanking is an accepted form of discipline and circumcision is a tradition expected to be followed for all generations. In other countries, these behaviors are considered abusive. When interacting with families from other countries, acknowledging these differences in beliefs could mean distinguishing abusive parents from caring, traditional parents.
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of families from unfamiliar cultures and origins. As discussed with the blog on Media, many television shows, news reports, movies, and other forms of media wrongly portray international families, or only portray a small percentage of the population. These messages the viewers receive influence how they perceive international families because they may display only the stereotypical aspect of the families or misrepresent or not represent some other families at all.
Throughout the week, the topic of self-esteem of children in different cultures was also touched on. The different child-rearing approaches, as mentioned in the introductory blog, have a major influence on the child’s development no matter what culture they belong to. It is shown that in different cultures, some of the traditions and structures of the families cause the children to generally have a lower self-esteem, while others have the opposite effect and the children develop positive images of themselves. Not only does child-rearing affect how the child will develop morals, norms, behaviors, and so on, but it will also have an impact on the child’s self-esteem in the future.
Another part of this week’s blog was discussing whether or not there are adversities to adopting babies from across our borders. One of the factors discussed was a family adopting a child who is of a different ethnicity and race. Many people and organizations are opposed to this thought because they feel that the child will lose their traditional values. Another key factor of adoption that was expressed was on how the child would adjust to the new family. It seems that even though a family may give their adoptive child love and affection, it is hard for many children to adjust to their new environment.
The last topic discussed this week talked about how international perspectives of child rearing are rubbing off on American parents. We have seen how the international influence has impacted the way American parents care for their children and even how parents name their children. The Baby Wearing technique as an example has made a noticeable surge amongst American parents.
All children across the globe are raised differently. I am sure that every single parent feels that they have their own individualized way at rearing their child. There are probably over a thousand variations of ways to raise a child. Although there may be many ways, there are also cultural norms that are followed by people of each country. A great article discussing this is: (http://www.babyzone.com/toddler/toddler_development/discipline/article/child-rearing-around-world) Child rearing is in my mind one of the most important worldly issues to be talked about. The future of the world relies on the children that each generation produces. Depending on how that child is raised often times foreshadows what that child may be like as an adult.
I challenge all those who have read all of this week’s posts to think to themselves on how this weeks blog has impacted the way they think on child rearing.
This post was presented by: Annika Ecklund, Carolyn Kaufman, Sally Pitcher, Stephanie Vassillion, Karl Daruwala, Elissa May
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of families from unfamiliar cultures and origins. As discussed with the blog on Media, many television shows, news reports, movies, and other forms of media wrongly portray international families, or only portray a small percentage of the population. These messages the viewers receive influence how they perceive international families because they may display only the stereotypical aspect of the families or misrepresent or not represent some other families at all.
Throughout the week, the topic of self-esteem of children in different cultures was also touched on. The different child-rearing approaches, as mentioned in the introductory blog, have a major influence on the child’s development no matter what culture they belong to. It is shown that in different cultures, some of the traditions and structures of the families cause the children to generally have a lower self-esteem, while others have the opposite effect and the children develop positive images of themselves. Not only does child-rearing affect how the child will develop morals, norms, behaviors, and so on, but it will also have an impact on the child’s self-esteem in the future.
Another part of this week’s blog was discussing whether or not there are adversities to adopting babies from across our borders. One of the factors discussed was a family adopting a child who is of a different ethnicity and race. Many people and organizations are opposed to this thought because they feel that the child will lose their traditional values. Another key factor of adoption that was expressed was on how the child would adjust to the new family. It seems that even though a family may give their adoptive child love and affection, it is hard for many children to adjust to their new environment.
The last topic discussed this week talked about how international perspectives of child rearing are rubbing off on American parents. We have seen how the international influence has impacted the way American parents care for their children and even how parents name their children. The Baby Wearing technique as an example has made a noticeable surge amongst American parents.
All children across the globe are raised differently. I am sure that every single parent feels that they have their own individualized way at rearing their child. There are probably over a thousand variations of ways to raise a child. Although there may be many ways, there are also cultural norms that are followed by people of each country. A great article discussing this is: (http://www.babyzone.com/toddler/toddler_development/discipline/article/child-rearing-around-world) Child rearing is in my mind one of the most important worldly issues to be talked about. The future of the world relies on the children that each generation produces. Depending on how that child is raised often times foreshadows what that child may be like as an adult.
I challenge all those who have read all of this week’s posts to think to themselves on how this weeks blog has impacted the way they think on child rearing.
This post was presented by: Annika Ecklund, Carolyn Kaufman, Sally Pitcher, Stephanie Vassillion, Karl Daruwala, Elissa May
Concluding Blog to International Perspectives on Child Rearing
Having an international perspective on some essential issues involving families shows how differently the same social institution can function in different cultural circumstances. In some countries, as mentioned in the blog on Tuesday, spanking is an accepted form of discipline and circumcision is a tradition expected to be followed for all generations. In other countries, these behaviors are considered abusive. When interacting with families from other countries, acknowledging these differences in beliefs could mean distinguishing abusive parents from caring, traditional parents.
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of families from unfamiliar cultures and origins. As discussed with the blog on Media, many television shows, news reports, movies, and other forms of media wrongly portray international families, or only portray a small percentage of the population. These messages the viewers receive influence how they perceive international families because they may display only the stereotypical aspect of the families or misrepresent or not represent some other families at all.
Throughout the week, the topic of self-esteem of children in different cultures was also touched on. The different child-rearing approaches, as mentioned in the introductory blog, have a major influence on the child’s development no matter what culture they belong to. It is shown that in different cultures, some of the traditions and structures of the families cause the children to generally have a lower self-esteem, while others have the opposite effect and the children develop positive images of themselves. Not only does child-rearing affect how the child will develop morals, norms, behaviors, and so on, but it will also have an impact on the child’s self-esteem in the future.
Another part of this week’s blog was discussing whether or not there are adversities to adopting babies from across our borders. One of the factors discussed was a family adopting a child who is of a different ethnicity and race. Many people and organizations are opposed to this thought because they feel that the child will lose their traditional values. Another key factor of adoption that was expressed was on how the child would adjust to the new family. It seems that even though a family may give their adoptive child love and affection, it is hard for many children to adjust to their new environment.
The last topic discussed this week talked about how international perspectives of child rearing are rubbing off on American parents. We have seen how the international influence has impacted the way American parents care for their children and even how parents name their children. The Baby Wearing technique as an example has made a noticeable surge amongst American parents.
All children across the globe are raised differently. I am sure that every single parent feels that they have their own individualized way at rearing their child. There are probably over a thousand variations of ways to raise a child. Although there may be many ways, there are also cultural norms that are followed by people of each country. A great article discussing this is: (http://www.babyzone.com/toddler/toddler_development/discipline/article/child-rearing-around-world) Child rearing is in my mind one of the most important worldly issues to be talked about. The future of the world relies on the children that each generation produces. Depending on how that child is raised often times foreshadows what that child may be like as an adult.
I challenge all those who have read all of this week’s posts to think to themselves on how this weeks blog has impacted the way they think on child rearing.
This post was presented by: Annika Ecklund, Carolyn Kaufman, Sally Pitcher, Stephanie Vassillion, Karl Daruwala, Elissa May
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of families from unfamiliar cultures and origins. As discussed with the blog on Media, many television shows, news reports, movies, and other forms of media wrongly portray international families, or only portray a small percentage of the population. These messages the viewers receive influence how they perceive international families because they may display only the stereotypical aspect of the families or misrepresent or not represent some other families at all.
Throughout the week, the topic of self-esteem of children in different cultures was also touched on. The different child-rearing approaches, as mentioned in the introductory blog, have a major influence on the child’s development no matter what culture they belong to. It is shown that in different cultures, some of the traditions and structures of the families cause the children to generally have a lower self-esteem, while others have the opposite effect and the children develop positive images of themselves. Not only does child-rearing affect how the child will develop morals, norms, behaviors, and so on, but it will also have an impact on the child’s self-esteem in the future.
Another part of this week’s blog was discussing whether or not there are adversities to adopting babies from across our borders. One of the factors discussed was a family adopting a child who is of a different ethnicity and race. Many people and organizations are opposed to this thought because they feel that the child will lose their traditional values. Another key factor of adoption that was expressed was on how the child would adjust to the new family. It seems that even though a family may give their adoptive child love and affection, it is hard for many children to adjust to their new environment.
The last topic discussed this week talked about how international perspectives of child rearing are rubbing off on American parents. We have seen how the international influence has impacted the way American parents care for their children and even how parents name their children. The Baby Wearing technique as an example has made a noticeable surge amongst American parents.
All children across the globe are raised differently. I am sure that every single parent feels that they have their own individualized way at rearing their child. There are probably over a thousand variations of ways to raise a child. Although there may be many ways, there are also cultural norms that are followed by people of each country. A great article discussing this is: (http://www.babyzone.com/toddler/toddler_development/discipline/article/child-rearing-around-world) Child rearing is in my mind one of the most important worldly issues to be talked about. The future of the world relies on the children that each generation produces. Depending on how that child is raised often times foreshadows what that child may be like as an adult.
I challenge all those who have read all of this week’s posts to think to themselves on how this weeks blog has impacted the way they think on child rearing.
This post was presented by: Annika Ecklund, Carolyn Kaufman, Sally Pitcher, Stephanie Vassillion, Karl Daruwala, Elissa May
Concluding Blog to International Perspectives on Child Rearing
Having an international perspective on some essential issues involving families shows how differently the same social institution can function in different cultural circumstances. In some countries, as mentioned in the blog on Tuesday, spanking is an accepted form of discipline and circumcision is a tradition expected to be followed for all generations. In other countries, these behaviors are considered abusive. When interacting with families from other countries, acknowledging these differences in beliefs could mean distinguishing abusive parents from caring, traditional parents.
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of families from unfamiliar cultures and origins. As discussed with the blog on Media, many television shows, news reports, movies, and other forms of media wrongly portray international families, or only portray a small percentage of the population. These messages the viewers receive influence how they perceive international families because they may display only the stereotypical aspect of the families or misrepresent or not represent some other families at all.
Throughout the week, the topic of self-esteem of children in different cultures was also touched on. The different child-rearing approaches, as mentioned in the introductory blog, have a major influence on the child’s development no matter what culture they belong to. It is shown that in different cultures, some of the traditions and structures of the families cause the children to generally have a lower self-esteem, while others have the opposite effect and the children develop positive images of themselves. Not only does child-rearing affect how the child will develop morals, norms, behaviors, and so on, but it will also have an impact on the child’s self-esteem in the future.
Another part of this week’s blog was discussing whether or not there are adversities to adopting babies from across our borders. One of the factors discussed was a family adopting a child who is of a different ethnicity and race. Many people and organizations are opposed to this thought because they feel that the child will lose their traditional values. Another key factor of adoption that was expressed was on how the child would adjust to the new family. It seems that even though a family may give their adoptive child love and affection, it is hard for many children to adjust to their new environment.
The last topic discussed this week talked about how international perspectives of child rearing are rubbing off on American parents. We have seen how the international influence has impacted the way American parents care for their children and even how parents name their children. The Baby Wearing technique as an example has made a noticeable surge amongst American parents.
All children across the globe are raised differently. I am sure that every single parent feels that they have their own individualized way at rearing their child. There are probably over a thousand variations of ways to raise a child. Although there may be many ways, there are also cultural norms that are followed by people of each country. A great article discussing this is: (http://www.babyzone.com/toddler/toddler_development/discipline/article/child-rearing-around-world) Child rearing is in my mind one of the most important worldly issues to be talked about. The future of the world relies on the children that each generation produces. Depending on how that child is raised often times foreshadows what that child may be like as an adult.
I challenge all those who have read all of this week’s posts to think to themselves on how this weeks blog has impacted the way they think on child rearing.
This post was presented by: Annika Ecklund, Carolyn Kaufman, Sally Pitcher, Stephanie Vassillion, Karl Daruwala, Elissa May
It is easy to misunderstand the nature of families from unfamiliar cultures and origins. As discussed with the blog on Media, many television shows, news reports, movies, and other forms of media wrongly portray international families, or only portray a small percentage of the population. These messages the viewers receive influence how they perceive international families because they may display only the stereotypical aspect of the families or misrepresent or not represent some other families at all.
Throughout the week, the topic of self-esteem of children in different cultures was also touched on. The different child-rearing approaches, as mentioned in the introductory blog, have a major influence on the child’s development no matter what culture they belong to. It is shown that in different cultures, some of the traditions and structures of the families cause the children to generally have a lower self-esteem, while others have the opposite effect and the children develop positive images of themselves. Not only does child-rearing affect how the child will develop morals, norms, behaviors, and so on, but it will also have an impact on the child’s self-esteem in the future.
Another part of this week’s blog was discussing whether or not there are adversities to adopting babies from across our borders. One of the factors discussed was a family adopting a child who is of a different ethnicity and race. Many people and organizations are opposed to this thought because they feel that the child will lose their traditional values. Another key factor of adoption that was expressed was on how the child would adjust to the new family. It seems that even though a family may give their adoptive child love and affection, it is hard for many children to adjust to their new environment.
The last topic discussed this week talked about how international perspectives of child rearing are rubbing off on American parents. We have seen how the international influence has impacted the way American parents care for their children and even how parents name their children. The Baby Wearing technique as an example has made a noticeable surge amongst American parents.
All children across the globe are raised differently. I am sure that every single parent feels that they have their own individualized way at rearing their child. There are probably over a thousand variations of ways to raise a child. Although there may be many ways, there are also cultural norms that are followed by people of each country. A great article discussing this is: (http://www.babyzone.com/toddler/toddler_development/discipline/article/child-rearing-around-world) Child rearing is in my mind one of the most important worldly issues to be talked about. The future of the world relies on the children that each generation produces. Depending on how that child is raised often times foreshadows what that child may be like as an adult.
I challenge all those who have read all of this week’s posts to think to themselves on how this weeks blog has impacted the way they think on child rearing.
This post was presented by: Annika Ecklund, Carolyn Kaufman, Sally Pitcher, Stephanie Vassillion, Karl Daruwala, Elissa May
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)